Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religare Technova


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. clear consensus  DGG ( talk ) 02:54, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Religare Technova

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable business, with non-notable personnel. WP:PUFFERY that clearly makes this promotional in nature. Wikipedia is not a business directory, it's an encyclopedia ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 00:37, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable, promotional--William Thweatt Talk | Contribs 01:02, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Based on Manta, Religare Technova is now known as Dion Global Solutions, and has 60 employees. I could only find one independent source, which was when the company changed its name.  Company does not meet Wikipedia's corporate notability guideline, and article is written like an advertisement.  I removed some puffery and namechecking (i.e., listing names of non-notable people) from the article, but the article's history indicates that this WP:CRAP is continually re-added.  NJ Wine (talk) 04:33, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 07:11, 5 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: spam.-- Dewritech (talk)  08:54, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Sounds like an advertisement (WP:NOT) and non-notable. --Chip123456 (talk) 17:44, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clearly advertisement.  I was unable to locate any reliable sources on a brief search.  If by some chance this is retained, it needs a complete rewrite for spam removal and bafflegab translation.  Ubelowme (talk) 20:14, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - obviously an advert. There are no reliable sources in the article.  →TSU tp* 10:21, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.