Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religious-exempt degrees


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:25, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Religious-exempt degrees

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This is a POV essay that cannot be salvaged. This text has been added by several single purpose accounts and subsequently removed by consensus from Educational accreditation several times over many months. At most, the subject deserves a sentence in Unaccredited institutions of higher learning. Novaseminary (talk) 22:36, 14 April 2010 (UTC)


 * There has been no discussion about it, so "consensus" is a very strong word. It is not POV either, and the sources are accurate. There must be room on the Wikipedia for articles not only about institutions accredited. Over 50 % of the states of the US gives the opportunity for religious institutions to grant degrees legally. Why is it a problem to write about this legal phenomenon?/Uekhen (talk) 22:40, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - There was discussion of this text, however minor at Talk:Educational_accreditation. In addition, I would note that several brand new editors seem determined to add this text someplace on WP. The contributions of the following editors strike me as supicious vis-a-vis this article or the text making up this article: Brunovitz, Surubal, Ulanbater, Tyryi, Uekhen, Ueken‎, Zingoole, and Baramba.
 * Novaseminary (talk) 23:06, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I thought this discussion was about the text, not about contributors. The "discussion" was two users agreeing with eachother, and one of them was Novaseminary./Uekhen (talk) 23:15, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Delete as POV fork. I echo the concerns above about the SPAs involved in creating this article. --ElKevbo (talk) 03:35, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, highly unnecessary POV fork on a generally non-notable topic; agreed that at most this merits a very brief mention in an existing article. I've sent the various editors, including the creator User:Ueken and the commenter User:Uekhen above, to WP:SPI.   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 01:00, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.