Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religious and mythological references in Battlestar Galactica


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:04, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Religious and mythological references in Battlestar Galactica

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

All of these are blatantly original research. Not encyclopedic to be useful on Wikipedia Cylon B (talk) 15:49, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - This article is ridiculous amounts of WP:CRUFT at best, and complete WP:OR at worst. While the article contains a handful of sources, nearly all of them are unusable.  Most are either from fansites/wikis, and a lot of them are complete synthesis on the part of the article's author, such as using the Book of Mormon as a reference to support something about this show that was very obviously not mentioned there.  As far as I can tell, there is only one, single source in this entire article that is actually a reliable source, which is the article from The Guardian.  Even if there are more reliable sources out there that would support an article on this topic (which I kind of doubt), the current article is such a complete mess that it would still be better to delete it and start over.  64.183.45.226 (talk) 17:10, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete unneccesary content fork. Any material that is notable can be covered in the main article on Battlestar Galactica.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:28, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - I have no stake in this battle, pardon the pun, but even this extended essay is woefully incomplete. For example, I recall there was an episode involving the archangel Gabriel's appearance. Can somebody userfy it? Bearian (talk) 18:34, 28 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.