Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rem Efficiency


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mindmatrix 00:38, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Rem Efficiency
This article is a hoax. Google returns no results for "Rem Efficiency" that don't pertain to sleep. One wanker spouting off in college does not encyclopedic make. Scott Ritchie 06:01, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Page vadalised by 128.237.232.118 Agnte 22:11, 9 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Joke. JoaoRicardo 06:05, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete NNB. --Cyde Weys [u]  [t]  [c] 07:45, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, someone must be getting bored studying for finals. Mat334 08:54, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as hoax or inside joke. Ifnord 18:58, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Hoax, Rubbish. Agnte 22:12, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nominator. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 22:32, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, comes very close to patent nonsense but let's just slowly delete it. Stifle 23:21, 11 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.