Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remember Me (Daley song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:09, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Remember Me (Daley song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not indicate notability as per WP:NALBUMS Prestonmag (talk) 19:25, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - currently unreleased, so remake if it charts upon final release. It is also the first single (apparently) by Daley, so it doesn't get notability that way either.
 * Keep - convinced by the recently-created sources that this is indeed notable. Lukeno94 (talk) 20:57, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:19, 25 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - Enough     media coverage. It is notable enough to have its own article. Eduemoni↑talk↓  14:49, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Here's a source review:
 * A discussion with video at Thatgrapejuice.net. I think this site is of marginal reliability, but not wholly unreliable. It seems to be a one-man operation.
 * This article at Alfitude is simply a posting of the video with no commentary. Not substantial coverage.
 * This article at Digitalspy is very short, but I think digitalspy is a reliable source for these purposes. It's owned by Hearst, a large media conglomerate, and probably has some form of editorial oversight.
 * This short description at Soulculture.co.uk is ok, but it is of fair reliability. It seems to have an editorial board, even though it's a blog.
 * This article at altsounds is pretty in-depth, and it has editorial oversight.
 * This brief synopsis at GRMdaily is trivial, and the site is of questionable reliability.
 * This brief at Dropoutuk is similar in character to GRMdaily.
 * This from the BBC is of sterling reliability but is trivial in nature.
 * Not much else is turning up. The WP:NALBUMS guideline says a single does not inherit notability and must stand on its own. Thus we go back to the WP:GNG. I think the coverage above passes those guidelines, but only just barely. A lot of it is trivial discussion and not all of it is in reliable sources, but I cede the benefit of the doubt here. --Batard0 (talk) 19:17, 31 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:04, 1 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep enough sources. One more source heat Radio brief and reliable.--Salix (talk): 08:20, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.