Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remi Yamamoto


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit  01:25, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Remi Yamamoto

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Run-of-the-WP:MILL staffer fails WP:GNG. Being the senior advisor for communications to the White House Chief of Staff is not a notable position in the slightest. Not everyone who works in the White House is automatically notable. Oh, and neither is someone who works as "traveling national press secretary" of a political campaign. KidAd •  SPEAK  02:31, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 03:05, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 03:06, 9 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment: seems like two feature non-trivial sources in the article. Unsure right now. Lightburst (talk) 03:08, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 03:44, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak delete. Couldn't find much besides the two sources of the article and this one. The The Hawai‘i Herald seems like a bit of narrow and obscure source. Vogue is clearly in-depth, but I think some more is needed for someone with a lower-level White House position. - Tristan Surtel (talk) 07:40, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep I find that she was the spokesperson for the failed Iowa Gubernatorial Democrat candidate Fred Hubbell. 1, 2, and a Press release about her from the White House, Photo of her traveling with President Biden. It makes USA Today when she tweets. I think the many publicized mentions and the two sources in the article give the subject notability. Serving the President of the United States - or speaking for the President is notable. Lightburst (talk) 15:33, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep My comment is close to Lightburst and the sources was provided him can demonstrate notability of subject.Misasory (talk) 13:31, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable political position, lacks of significant coverage. Brayan ocaner (talk) 20:36, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems to be enough there in her life to demonstrate notability.Patapsco913 (talk) 14:23, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  03:12, 16 October 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle (talk • contribs) 14:31, 23 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.