Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reminiscences (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. Nomination withdrawn by AfD creator as a result of work done to save the article. No delete !votes present at time of close and no new !votes added for a few days. red dog six (talk) 23:21, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Reminiscences (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Fails WP:NOTFILM. Given the work that has been done on the article by Schmidt, the article now meets inclusion criteria. I withdraw the nomination. If we can get Legis to change his !vote to keep, I'll close the nomination as a keep. BTW - I "tip my hat" to Schmidt, his work in saving the article is a wonderful example of his dedication to provide a quality Wikipedia. red dog six (talk) 02:11, 10 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Article appears to lack significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails to meet the notability guidelines for films. Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  23:40, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 11 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Per non-English sourcing added by MichaelQSchmidt. I believe it is sufficient to meet the general notability guidelines. And, as he pointed out, the film will more than likely receive more English coverage after the premiere in the United States. Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  16:14, 12 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Keep. Happy to make it unanimous. --Legis (talk - contribs) 07:47, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep after my own work and research turning the stub article as first nominated into something better sourced and more encyclopedic. We do have the understandable difficulties facing us when dealing with an independent documentary film created in Peru and then screening in Peru and then France, but the film IS due to have its US premiere in less than two weeks at the Museum of Modern Art in Manhattan, after which it is reasonable to believe we'll have Enlish language coverage to supplement the coverage I found in Peruvian and French sources.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:19, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Michael Q Schmidt. Good work, that. The US release is close enough to justify keeping, as we'll have lots of additional coverage. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 18:26, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.