Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remit2Home


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedied as spam. --Fang Aili talk 16:39, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Remit2Home

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

112 Google hits for a major company is not impressive. Article reads like an ad, which is not grounds for deletion by itself but suggests a possible conflict of interest that might explain the inflated statements. I say not notable; delete. N Shar 06:06, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree with justification. Cla68 06:40, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not assert notibility. Does not meant general notibility requirements for a buisness. No sources, all links are to its own site or nothing notible. No reason to believe full article could be written about the company since no other information seems notable.--Dacium 06:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and take a look at Online Money Transfer which is spam that mentions them too. --Steve (Slf67)talk 06:42, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete with All Manner of Haste and Fortitude Herin Prescribed, with Salt on Top - Blatant advertising, created by a user whose only contributions are to the aforementioned article and the one other article that links to it. (Which, incidentally, also reads like an advert) Kill it with fire. --  Y&#124; yukichigai (ramble argue check) 07:39, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as Yukichigai said. Blatant advertising is annoying.Young Skywalker 14:53, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.