Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remitly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Speedy keep vote by nominator, indicating withdrawal of nomination (non-admin closure)  C Thomas3   (talk) 04:39, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Remitly

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The only source not from the company itself (or one of its press releases) is a contribution that made it in Forbes listing it as the largest independent digital remittance company. That's a lot of qualifiers to make the mundane seem remarkable. A deeper search reveals a lot of review sites, but no third-parties actually adding notability to the company.  Orville1974  (talk) 01:08, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions.  Orville1974 


 * Speedy Keep - I'm the nominator. The article is brand new.  I've contacted the author with guidance on the content needed and preferred process for drafting new articles.  Orville1974  (talk) 01:21, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  94rain  Talk 01:38, 25 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Adding additional sources and types of sources for Remitly. Thesucculentking (talk) 02:01, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks. If you need any more advice or help, just let me know. Happy editing!  Orville1974  (talk) 03:00, 25 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.