Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remixes, Ace of Base


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash talk 23:56, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

Remixes, Ace of Base
Ace-of-Base-cruft - I don't believe this deserves its own article. I don't think this shoud be merged to the main Ace of Base article, either, for fear of clogging it up. Delete CLW 14:28, 11 October 2005 (UTC) *Keep. This is a type of list that should be kept. It can be maintained, it involves otherwise difficult to get information, and is likely too large to merge anyways. --badlydrawnjeff 13:38, 12 October 2005 (UTC) Apparently I was wrong, now that Qirex added the info with ease to the discography page, no reason to duplicate. Delete. --badlydrawnjeff 13:26, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Pointless cruft. / Peter Isotalo 15:29, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Ace of Base. If that would clutter too much, then keep, or merge with a discography of Ace of Base in sections. Trollderella 15:52, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Ace-of-base-cruft - now there's a word I didn't expect to ever see. Delete, unencyclopaedic and not worth merging - a lot of singles have remixes on their B-side, and a list of every single one for every artist with such singles would clutter up a huge number of articles. --Last Malthusian 16:03, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - Cruft. -- Rune Welsh | &tau;&alpha;&lambda;&kappa; | Esperanza  18:11, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ace-of-base-cruft. Andrew pmk | Talk 01:05, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, discographies are encyclopedic, wikipedia is not paper. Kappa 01:06, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Agreed, but this isn't a discography. Discographies include singles, albums, and possibly compilations, not remixes. The excessive length of this list and its extremely low information-to-data ratio (so which is better: the Armand's 'British Nites' Remix of Lucky Love or Armand's 'British Nite' Mix Edit?) illustrate why that is. As for your other argument, I see your WP:NOT paper and raise you one WP:NOT indiscriminate collection of information. --Last Malthusian 10:29, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: I just spent half an hour cleaning up this exact same information over at Discography of Ace of Base. This is a useless, hard-to-read duplicate. --Qirex 02:54, 17 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.