Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remorse ASCII


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  14:30, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Remorse ASCII

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Small hobby group of ASCII "artists" - the article is unsourced, fan essay, and was not notable at the time of authorship. Flibbertigibbets (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Flibbertigibbets (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources for this item. Nothing at in fact. Oaktree b (talk) 14:01, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. No reliable sources found. 0x Deadbeef →∞ (talk to me) 14:03, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not for things that artists make up on their own unless there are others who think those things are important. Ghost of Kiev  (talk) 17:05, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. I was unable to find any reliable references. Fifthapril (talk) 15:47, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment (wishing keep) Sigh. wish I could just vote keep but probably merge/redirect to ACiD Productions is the best that's possible since other that archives of their work at like textfiles and other scene sites, I was able to just find a master's thesis: Like City Lights, Receding: ANSi Artwork and the Digital Underground, 1985-2000 which mentions the group:
 * ACiD spun off an ASCII art subdivision called Remorse in December of 1994. and By this time a substantial proportion of warez trading had shifted to the Internet, which preferred the platform-independence of ASCII art over Codepage 437. In this it is notable that ACiD's Remorse ASCII division appeared approximately at the beginning of this trend and continued through to the end of ACiD as a driving force in computer art.
 * So... if this is deleted I'll try to add some more to the primary page. Skynxnex (talk) 17:16, 29 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.