Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remote Medical International (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Stifle (talk) 17:59, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Remote Medical International
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete, promotional article the one valid ref provided is [] and it talks about an investment the other sources are from the business itself or prwire. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG specifically Hell In A Bucket (talk) 03:11, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:36, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:36, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:36, 11 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable. Search came up dry, just a lot of company-generated listings, no news coverage (except as noted by nom). -- Scray (talk) 03:18, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Try clicking on the Google News link at the header of this discussion for independent, reliable sources; they exist. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:21, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep You're right - notable as you point out - thanks for setting me straight. -- Scray (talk) 03:57, 20 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 11:32, 18 July 2013 (UTC)


 * I work for Remote Medical International and edited the site because the article has been inaccurate (and unmaintained) for several years. We are a completely different company than we were when the article was originally written, and we're just trying to make it accurate. The intent is for accuracy and education, not for self-promotion. Any suggestions for improvement would be appreciated. I removed all citations that link back to our website or blog and have relied completely on secondary references. Any suggestions for improvement would be appreciated. 50.132.67.12 (talk) 19:04, 18 July 2013 (UTC)Shaehealey


 * Keep - Meets WP:CORPDEPTH for a standalone Wikipedia article:
 * Global link to medics a call away. The Columbus Dispatch.
 * Remote Medical International provides emergency services to travelers in distant locations. Puget Sound Business Journal.
 * Fort Lewis medics train for Afghanistan mountains. The Seattle Times.
 * Remote Medical International: to your (global) health. Seattle Business.
 * Also, and importantly, please note that per WP:NRVE, topic notability is based upon the availability of sources, rather than whether or not they're actually present in articles. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:23, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.