Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remote Telescope Markup Language


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 18:51, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Remote Telescope Markup Language

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Restored after being PROD deleted on the grounds that it is mentioned in a few telescope manuals, but I still can't find much more than that and material written by the language's creators. I remain unconviced that this is notable. Reyk YO! 17:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:08, 25 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. It looks like this language has been discussed in detail in many reliable sources, including journal and news articles; not all are telescope manuals or from the creators. There's usable content for expansion about the language's history, structure, and current uses, so I'd say it passes WP:SIGCOV and merits a keep. ComplexRational (talk) 03:09, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I have since added some sources. While the article may remain a stub, these sources seem to demonstrate notability (they are independent, detailed, and peer-reviewed). ComplexRational (talk) 15:58, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 17:48, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep The sources added by ComplexRational show significant coverage in multiple reliable sources and the ESA source describes RTML as a standard. The topic merits a keep per WP:HEY. -- 10:21, 3 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.