Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remote bookkeeping


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete and redirect term to Bookkeeping. No properly verified information to merge at this point. — Satori Son 16:55, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Remote bookkeeping

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete, no sources, bordeline ad Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:20, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and source could go into Bookkeeping if some sources are there doesnt really have notability for standing alone Ottawa4ever (talk) 19:22, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:21, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ( X! ·  talk )  · @979  · 22:29, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete no evidence that the mechanics of doing bookkeeping in this way are notable. JJL (talk) 02:28, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Merge into Bookkeeping. Not noteworthy enough to stand as a separate subject. • Anakin (talk) 17:08, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect as either WP:NEO or WP:DICTDEF. I don't see anything notable about this specific mode of bookkeeping. DMacks (talk) 07:21, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.