Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remy Zaken


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Erik9 (talk) 02:00, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Remy Zaken

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:Entertainer Drawn Some (talk) 19:24, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television, stage performances, or other productions.
 * 2) Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following.
 * 3) Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:ENTERTAINER does not supercede WP:GNG. http://www.google.nl/search?rlz=1C1GGLS_nlNL291NL303&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q="remy+zaken" The first 2 pages on this Google Search alone yields at least 4 reliable sources for information about her. More than enough to establish notability through sources, rather than the guideline alone. - Mgm|(talk) 12:46, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Two words: due diligence. at least do a google search before copy and pasting a rationale. HJMitchell    You rang?  22:00, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note. I've basically given the article a major overhaul, I've added more information and a load of references. Not all of them pass WP:RS, granted, but they all illustrate the point. HJMitchell    You rang?  23:31, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:GNG is the parent of the the lessor criteria WP:ENTERTAINER. If WP:N is met, one need look no futher only in order to find ways to exclude.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:57, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I am requesting that this be relisted for consensus. Of the 10 references now listed, all 10 are trivial mentions, only two are anything other than mentions of her name.  Neither the basic requirements for notability nor the requirements for entertainer are met. Drawn Some (talk) 01:03, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.