Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renaissance Ebooks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 03:14, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Renaissance Ebooks

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete unsourced article about a company that claims to be a publisher of reprints of Lovecraft and others and of adult material but I couldn't find any google hits sourcing that or showing notability of the company otherwise Carlossuarez46 19:24, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Delete Not notable probably a hoax.(GowsiPowsi 20:46, 22 August 2007 (UTC))
 * Delete as failing WP:CORP and WP:WEB. Non-notable e-tailer. (Not sure where previous commenter's "hoax" is coming from.) --Dhartung | Talk 22:02, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Article has been modified with quotes added since above comments Samuelhaldane 12:29, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails notability criteria. Carlosguitar 12:25, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.