Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renaissance Papacy (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Merge with History of the Papacy. --Luigi30 (Ta&lambda;k) 16:12, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Renaissance Papacy (2nd nomination)

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

This article was originally nominated for deletion here as a POV essay of original reasearch. To solve these problems, it was reduced to a few sentences, which led it to be kept, many editors saying something to the effect of that they hoped it would be expanded. In the more than three months since, next to nothing has been done with it, and it remains a stub that contains no information that couldn't be included in Pope. Contrary to the statement on the tag, it has been tagged for expansion since October 2006. If this article were expanded, it might be useful, but as it stands, I don't see that it does any real service to the encyclopedia. Heimstern Läufer 17:56, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to Pope or rename as "History of the Papacy" if Pope becomes too long. Currently contains no useful content. Walton monarchist89 18:00, 20 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge any relevant info to Pope, then delete. I agree with Walton that if that article is too long, a History article on the Papacy should be created, though it should cover the entire history of the papacy.  Finally, if an article like this does, in fact, need to exist then it should be renamed to show the years covered since 'Renaissance' is a bit ambiguous. --The Way 00:52, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * delete nothing worth merging or keeping. DGG 04:12, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to History of the Papacy Argyriou (talk) 22:18, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to History of the Papacy; if any one time period gets too long within that article, then create articles like this one. Pastordavid 23:45, 22 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.