Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renard Queenston


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Joseph Fox 18:23, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Renard Queenston

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Disputed prod. BLP with no reliable sources and a weak claim to notability. Dweller (talk) 13:38, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm sure the sources listed are the most reliable sources out of the very few that are available. Many, many people that enjoy the specific genre know of Renard Queenston - but it doesn't mean that there will be an abundance of sources to prove that he is notable. Just google "Renard", and you'll find that he holds a fair portion of the top results. (MacklinB (talk) 16:44, 25 August 2011 (UTC))


 * Keep. The few sources are probably the most reliable, and as above with the google results. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SalfEnergy (talk • contribs) 17:30, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not pass WP:NN, smells strongly of self-WP:PROMO and WP:COI. Srobak (talk) 06:04, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Not everything NEEDS news sources to be notable, there are many notable articles on Wikipedia with no/a small amount of references, such as Metynnis argenteus. I'm going to say Keep Werehog7 (talk) 10:14, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Our policy WP:BLP mandates that biographies of living people must be properly sourced. On top of that you might find WP:V relevant. If articles elsewhere are bad, they should also be deleted or improved. --Dweller (talk) 10:36, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:10, 26 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:49, 1 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. What label or labels does he work through? How would this pass the notability establishments? A few more sources would also be welcome, and it is slightly unfortunate that I am voting for deletion of this article. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 21:56, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * As it says on the article, his label is LapFox Trax. SalfEnergy 15:36, 2 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment. If the "keep" supporters above are correct in saying that the sources in the article are the most reliable available, then that is a reason for deletion rather than keeping. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:31, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.