Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renata Laxova


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Shimeru (talk) 21:52, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Renata Laxova

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The few listed sources are not about the subject, they include the subject, which is not the same thing. Guy (Help!) 20:22, 20 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. She discovered the "Neu-Laxová syndrome" which yields over a half million Google hits when the search is done requiring an exact phrase.  A similar search on her name yields over a thousand results.  A similar search with her name in Google Books yields 75 results, which should establish notability.  NYCRuss   ☎  22:42, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * So will you e adding sources about the subject rather than quoting the subject? Guy (Help!) 13:21, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Having a well written, well sourced article is not necessary to avoid deletion. Being notable is.  If sources do indeed exist to establish notability (I haven't checked them, but it seems likely that they do), then there is no need for anyone to improve the article for it to survive here.  If you don't like how it's sourced, fix it yourself.  AFD isn't cleanup. Buddy431 (talk) 21:18, 23 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:43, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:43, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - definitely notable - UtherSRG (talk) 06:52, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Sources are clearly available. Edward321 (talk) 16:55, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.