Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renato Abella


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:25, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Renato Abella

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It would appear that this article fails WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:MUSIC and any number of other policies and guidelines. Addressing the references: Pete AU aka Shirt58 (talk) 10:50, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Simply being interviewed on the radio station WHUD would appear to be of very little assistance to an assertion of notability. Many people are interviewed on radio every day. For completeness, this is the mention of the interview from Mr Abella's personal website. The suggested interview itself 404s
 * A search from the URL given in the Classic Rock (magazine) article yields "Your search for Renato Abella returned 0 results."
 * http://powerplaymagazine.co.uk/ doesn't have a Wikipedia article. While this does not prove it is not a reliable source, it does appear to be an online magazine that more solicits content from artists instead of publishing original content about them. There is no mention all of the subject of the article within a Google search for "Abella site:powerplaymagazine.co.uk"
 * There is a Wikipedia article Fireworks (magazine), but this obviously and trivially not is meant by "Fireworks Magazine". This would appear to be about the http://www.rocktopia.co.uk/ sub-site "Fireworks Magazine Online Section". Again, there is no Wikipedia article about this "online magazine", and that's most probably because it an internet discussion forum. A search within that website yields "Your search - "Renato Abella" site:www.rocktopia.co.uk/ - did not match any documents."
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 10:53, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 10:53, 19 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - As noted in detail above, there is nothing substantial to determine notability.London Hall (talk) 11:09, 19 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.