Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renato Nobili


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 20:24, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Renato Nobili

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to fail WP:NPROF and WP:GNG, due to the lack of any significant work, and the distinct lack of in-depth, non-trivial coverage in independent WP:RS. Tagged as failing GNG for nearly 5 years. Luke no 94 (tell Luke off here) 11:14, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:32, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:32, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:32, 27 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. GS h-index of only 6. Too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:26, 27 August 2013 (UTC).
 * Delete. He has a few reasonably well cited publications concerning the cochlea (citation counts 140, 128, 85 in Google scholar); the 85-cite one seems to be omitted from Xxanthippe's count) but not well enough to convince me of WP:PROF (not even in the top 50 publications on this subject). And his impact in cellular automata and other subjects is far below that. None of the other criteria in WP:PROF, nor WP:GNG, seem likely either. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:03, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not fulfil any of the criteria set out at WP:ACADEMIC, H-index ~6 according to google scholar from my count, which isn't indicative of someone who is particularly noteworthy, IRWolfie- (talk) 18:00, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.