Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renault RE16 Turbo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 01:20, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Renault RE16 Turbo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nothing but a list of technical specifications. No context provided. No claim of notability. Not very notable anyway. Tvx1 18:22, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - nothing particularly notable about this engine, it isn't as if every engine every manufacturer ever produces for F1 is listed. Shritwod (talk) 18:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. No indication that this engine is notable, and it's unlikely there ever will be as individual F1 engines very rarely receive significant attention. QueenCake (talk) 21:34, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nominator and previous commenters. Twirly Pen  ( Speak up ) 23:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Deleting discussions aren't votings. Contributions that don't contain any reasoned arguments are likely to be discarded by the reviewer. Tvx1 10:14, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Pretty much everything was covered by you and the two previous commenters, so there was nothing I needed to add except my agreement. Nothing in the guidelines discourages such comments, only those that simply say "Keep" or "Delete" with no further content or reasoning. I'm well aware of how AfD works, as I've participated (successfully, at that) in these discussions before. Twirly Pen  ( Speak up ) 10:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.