Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rendu Jella Sita


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep per nom's withdrawal..  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 02:36, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Rendu Jella Sita

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't verify that this meets WP:NFILMor WP:GNG. Sending WP:APPNOTE to. Boleyn (talk) 20:05, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 18 July 2015 (UTC)


 * WP:INDAFD: Rendu Jella Sita


 * Comment: Difficulties with pre-internet Indian films notwithstanding, this one is not unsourcable and seems to have made it into the enduring record as a film which was the debut film for a notable actress.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 02:37, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * keep: In hasam magazine, An acclaimed film-critic wrote article about this film, and later it has been published as a part of the book Jandhya marutham too. Apart from that, many film magazines, film pages in telugu news papers also featured articles about this book on the occasion of 25 years of film release. I think this film is notable in that aspect.--Pavan santhosh.s (talk) 11:07, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
 * , do you have references from that which you can add to the article? Boleyn (talk) 11:56, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
 * , Yes. But in the form of telugu book. It is available to purchase online here. I can add some more information and citations too, but I've to know whether citing a telugu book is OK? --Pavan santhosh.s (talk) 12:26, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
 * , citing a foreign language book is fine. Thanks for your help, Boleyn (talk) 17:08, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawn per convincing comments above. Boleyn (talk) 11:56, 21 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.