Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renee Pistone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:08, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Renee Pistone

 * – ( View AfD View log )

four cites is not enough for WP:PROF, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 05:40, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:39, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:39, 17 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 00:43, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:33, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter  (yak)  20:40, 8 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak delete Article does not give any indication that this might meet WP:PROF. The "weak" is because I don't have time to search around for more sources myself, I hope and trust that the nom has done this. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 20:57, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:PROF. The assertion that her research is "pioneering" is not backed-up by any sources. Location (talk) 05:07, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - After several searches, I have not found coverage in reliable sources. Directory listings exist, such as this listing on the Rutgers University website, but otherwise, not finding reliable sources that cover this individual. Northamerica1000 (talk) 15:37, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.