Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reno Barons


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:23, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Reno Barons

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable indoor American football team that played half a season in 2011. I'm not finding enough sources that would make this team pass WP:ORGDEPTH. Tavix | Talk 16:43, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. Tavix | Talk  16:45, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Tavix | Talk  16:45, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Tavix | Talk  16:47, 5 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - not notable, even link to club's webpage is dead Tymon. r   Do you have any questions?  16:49, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom. If the above reasons weren't enough, they also clearly do not meet WP:NSPORTS. Bordwall( talk &frasl; ctrb ) 17:01, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I appreciate the concern, but WP:NSPORTS doesn't cover teams. See Notability_(sports). Tavix | Talk 17:24, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh! I'd never noticed that line. Thanks for the heads up! Bordwall( talk &frasl; ctrb ) 17:39, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. I've made that same mistake before too. It just doesn't seem intuitive to have teams under WP:ORG and not WP:NSPORTS. I understand why though, and am not too concerned either way. Cheers, Tavix | Talk 18:11, 5 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Non-notable minor league football team that never played a regular season game. Fails the notability guidelines for sports teams and other organizations per WP:ORG and WP:GNG for lack of significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 00:28, 12 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.