Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renonyx


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 17:36, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Renonyx

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable artist. No independent sources are provided in the article, and if independent coverage exists at all I haven't been able to find it. Kolbasz (talk) 14:41, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Kolbasz (talk) 14:46, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Kolbasz (talk) 14:48, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:25, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:25, 11 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete This one hits the jackpot. Several assertions of notability which are incorrect or deliberately obfuscated (such as citing an indie editing role for calling him a "filmmaker"). Article written by two newborn SPAs in 1 day. Deep personal history with no sources. No independent or third-party coverage. Major WP:PEACOCK. 157.235.66.80 (talk) 16:29, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Or anyway I don't see notability as a photographer. Is the claim that he's notable as something other than a photographer? -- Hoary (talk) 11:29, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Notable as anything, relaly. The article attempts "throw everything against the wall and see if anything sticks" notability: as a photographer, as an artist, as a musician, as a filmmaker, as a businessman... but regardless of which aspect you look at, none of it has received significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Kolbasz (talk) 14:39, 19 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.