Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RentSeeker Inc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Also eligible for G5 speedy deletion per Sockpuppet investigations/Vasu1206. MER-C 08:49, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

RentSeeker Inc

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable corporation. Nothing aside from press releases and glancing mentions on due diligence. Does not otherwise meet GNG. Jack Frost (talk) 11:01, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 11:01, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 11:01, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 11:01, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep, Rentseeker is a notable company in Canada. The notability is justified on various trusted news websites such as Huffpost, Daily Hive, CTV News, Global News, RenX, Torontostoreys and others. These resources are reliable and independent of the subject and not the press releases. It is also listed on BBB. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JPKSingh (talk • contribs) 11:43, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:46, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, Not notable at all and clearly WP:PROMO, with Alexa rank 9,056 in Canada which is very low and the website has no traffic at all plus no news coverage other than being just mentioned in a few. The only in-depth article about the website is a press release paid article. Clearly does not meet WP:GNG. Best - Blake44 (talk) 18:42, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TNT (filled with typos), WP:RS (weak on the sourcing) and WP:GNG (it's local to Toronto). It's badly written WP:SPAM. It's possible that a decent stub could be written, but it's not worth the effort. Bearian (talk) 14:23, 30 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.