Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renu Raj (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:42, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Renu Raj
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not eligible for G4, so we're back here. I'm just going to quote 's comment from the last AfD, since the rationale still holds: "Subject occupies an administrative government position, not really notable per WP:NPOLITICIAN, and for WP:GNG purposes the coverage seems fairly WP:ROUTINE. Much coverage is made of her passing a civil service exam, although I have no way of knowing why that would be notable; even those who pass the world's most difficult exam don't all merit articles here."  Onel 5969  TT me 13:45, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Medicine,  and Kerala.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:49, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. Some of the previous iteration's content has been repackaged as a "Controversies" section, perhaps to make it sound more compelling; but the relevant information is essentially the same. --Hadal (talk) 15:51, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Same as last time, civil servant, nothing notable. No coverage. Oaktree b (talk) 00:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. Further recreations should be done via WP:AFC. I was unaware this has been recreated, and the rationale I used when I proposed this for deletion the first time is unchanged, with the additional note that while the controversies mentioned in the article may be notable, the subject of the article is not; the coverage wasn't about her. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:01, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - in its current state the article is only serving as a WP:COATRACK for controversies this living person has been involved with. If these are the only noteworthy things about her then WP:BLP1E applies. She is not mentioned in the article on the more recent incident, suggesting her involvement was not significant, certainly not to the level that compels a standalone article. The older incident in Munnar we don't seem to have written about at all. This actually seems to be a WP:BLP0E. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:17, 3 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.