Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renzo Gracie Legacy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  The Nordic Goddess Kristen  Worship her 00:52, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Renzo Gracie Legacy

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not meet WP:FILM - only claim to notability is that the subject of the documentary is notable. Admittedly self-distributed and released with "little or no marketing" on a web site. No third-party sources.  Graymornings (talk) 21:58, 18 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - no sources to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 23:25, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Thanks to User:MichaelQSchmidt for digging up sources. -- Whpq (talk) 11:16, 20 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: no reliable independent 3rd party sources. JamesBurns (talk) 01:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  01:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  01:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  01:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep an actual, released film with plenty of ghits including several martial arts magazines (many of which are available in print at bookstores), , , . JJL (talk) 03:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Extreme keep as I have rescued the article since it was nominated, and it now shows proper notability. The sources provided are from those in the field qualified to make their statements. You won't read about this film in the Washington Post, just as you won't read about Barrack Obama in the Mixed Martial Arts Weekly. Reliability of sources must be considered in context to what is being sourced. Its now a keeper.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.