Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Replica manga


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Replica manga

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

No notability asserted at the article. Also, no third party reliable sources. Hahc21 [ TALK ] [ CONTRIBS  ] 22:46, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 28 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. – Allen4names 06:07, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete/Comment. A Google search reveals no reliable coverage, just those familiar illegal scanlation sites. Even a search using the manga's name in Katakana (レプリカ) was inconclusive. Note that, should the article be kept, the article should be moved to "Replica (manga)" (with "manga" parenthesis) per our naming conventions and the anime and manga Manual of Style. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:24, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete We cant do much here without sources this fails per WP:N and WP:V. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:40, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.