Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republic Act no. 5446


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unopposed. Transwiki can be done from the original.  Sandstein  11:40, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Republic Act no. 5446

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Copy-paste from the original document on Philippine government website. Not necessary to have its own article per other Philippine acts such as Republic Act No. 3359 (Philippines), Republic Act No. 9721 (Philippines), Republic Act No. 3423 (Philippines) and Republic Act No. 3358 (Philippines), in which all the links have been redirected. ~ Muffin Wizard;) 11:31, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:25, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:25, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Transwiki to Wikisource - That's why that site exists, right? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:26, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   10:46, 17 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete poorly written and organized--JumpLike23 (talk) 20:31, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 09:50, 24 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.