Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republic Bank & Trust Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 04:33, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Republic Bank & Trust Company

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability: This article contains no information about the subject's notability. Robinson weijman 08:28, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Needs clean-up and sourcing, but the company seems a decent size and as a bank chain is notable I'd have said StuartDouglas 12:11, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep: Article needs development, but clearly of sufficient size for inclusion. Newyorkbrad 20:20, 7 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment: Thank you for the responses so far. It appears that this bank is known to the previous two commenatators.  Is it well-known in the US?  Robinson weijman 07:37, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: I don't know it personally, but 40 branches over a reasonable geogrpahic area seems notable (from the distance of the width of the Atlantic anyway :-) StuartDouglas 10:16, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Hmmm, then I agree with your previous comment to keep and add references if it really is notable, i.e. those references can be found. If not, remove the article.  Robinson weijman 12:19, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I've never heard of it either, but I added some external links that I think could be turned into references. More references are probably available.  —Carolfrog 04:13, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.