Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republic of China – Hungarian relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:01, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Republic of China – Hungarian relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not only have these two not had relations for 60 years, there's also no indication relations were notable prior to 1949. The one salient fact, the switch in recognition, is noted here, here and here already. Biruitorul Talk 03:47, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete could find very little third party coverage of relationship, especially recently. only this from 2002 and 1999. LibStar (talk) 04:18, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails notability and not a directory or random collection of information. Better to have 200 sections or articles on "Foreign relations of ..." for each sovereign nation than about 20,000 random pairings which merely regurgitate information from the websites of the foreign ministries, and which will quickly become stale and outdated.Edison (talk) 15:25, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete As another one of these bondings between two random countries. However, I would advise waiting, as there's currently a discussion between bilateral relations; I recommend holding back until a decision is made. Cheers.  I 'mperator 18:24, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable, not likely to be found so. This article borders on being a mere dictionary entry. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  17:25, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete no reliable sources discuss this alleged relationship in its wikipedia article and none are findable by me. Fails V, N, etc...Bali ultimate (talk) 03:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to People's Republic of China – Hungary relations. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 11:28, 5 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.