Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republic of Emmeria


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete -- JForget 00:49, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Republic of Emmeria

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Nominating because it is the same unsourced material that is just... cruft. Nominating as a result of Articles for deletion/Estovakia, similar topic revolving Ace Combat 6 by Namco Bandai.  - Jameson L. Tai  talk  ♦  contribs   08:58, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, zero notability in the real world. Lankiveil (talk) 10:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC).
 * Delete- non-Notable. Springnuts (talk) 12:50, 3 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another (talk) 18:10, 3 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:N. Macy's123 review me 20:33, 3 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - An admirable effort that is doomed to fail because of the lack of reliable sources. User:Krator (t c) 01:29, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article is only a month old and apprently the creator is still working on it.  We should probably help him, rather than discourage him.  Best, --  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 03:13, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete it is extremely unlikely that this article could ever be verifiable; it is original research Gwernol 03:38, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm not sure how WikiProject Videogames does things, but I'd think that since the gameplay is the only way to verify this subject's material, it would be considered original research, as I'm sure the full plot of the game would not be leaked by NBGI because it would lose the point of beating out the game if you already know how it ends.  - Jameson L. Tai   talk  ♦  contribs   04:13, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * However, I would advise everyone here to make a decision whether or not to delete the Estovakia article (as it is pure rubbish in my opinion). Please comment here: Articles for deletion/Estovakia.   - Jameson L. Tai   talk  ♦  contribs   04:15, 4 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete: unsourced and, I believe, unsourceable (I deem it very unlikely that there will ever exist reliable books or papers about this particular fictional place). Goochelaar (talk) 18:32, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per some improvements. Bearian (talk) 19:57, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * weak keep considering the increasing amount written about games, i would not be prepared to say that this is usurcable.It does not take a whole book or an academic paper to be a sufficient source for notability. DGG (talk) 04:53, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - will change my mind if I see some independent, non-trivial, reliable coverage. Marasmusine (talk) 17:16, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - the fact that it's game content does not automatically justify deletion (notability is only a guideline anyway, and therefore isn't really enough to justify deletion on its own) but I don't see anything here that couldn't be covered by a paragraph in the Ace Combat 6 article. Cynical (talk) 14:58, 6 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Possible Merge Suggesting a merge into Nations of Ace Combat. Apparently another editor has supplied a pretty good list of nations in the Ace Combat series.  If this article's information can be verified, I suggest merging the information there instead.   - Jameson L. Tai   talk  ♦  contribs   10:30, 9 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete No out-of-universe content, no evidence of real-world notability. There is no reason this can't be adequately covered in the article about the game.  Pagra shtak  16:49, 9 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.