Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republic of Hawaii


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy keep another bad faith nomination. &middot; Katefan0(scribble)/ poll 00:27, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Republic of Hawaii
Certain persons have instigated proposals for deleting Republic of New Hampshire under the logic that that article should be either forwarded to New Hampshire or else deleted, because South Carolina got the same treatment.

In order to be fair, if Republic of New Hampshire is to be deleted or forwarded on this basis, then Republic of Texas and Republic of Hawaii should be treated similarly. Those who believe these should be kept are encouraged to go to the Republic of New Hampshire vfd to post a similar sentiment with that vote as well. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Citizenposse (talk • contribs) 00:07, 11 April 2006  (UTC)


 * This nomination is in bad faith, WP:POINT. Speedy Keep.  --  stillnotelf   is invisible  00:10, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * On the contrary, it is nominated in the same assumption of good faith that the nomination of Republic of New Hampshire was made. Not fair playing favorites, either everybody gets treated the same or the wikipedian principles of fairness are being violated. I say Keep all three.Citizenposse 00:14, 11 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.