Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republic of Macedonia in the Eurovision Dance Contest


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. This doesn't need to run for another five days. All these articles are unsourced two-line stubs which say "Country X have never entered this competition, but might do in 2009". Not in the slightest bit useful or encyclopedic. Black Kite 15:02, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Republic of Macedonia in the Eurovision Dance Contest

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Sub-stub, little context. Tagged as A7 but I declined since it's not a bio, group, etc. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 01:39, 8 September 2008 (UTC) Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 01:54, 8 September 2008 (UTC) 
 * See also:
 * Delete - Both of those articles have nothing to do with the countries performing in the contest. Each has two sentences; one telling about coverage of the event, and the other about how the might do next year. There's not much context or content in these articles. Delete both of them. RockManQ (talk) 01:57, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * All of those are copies of the Republic of Macedonia's article, except for Israel's which has a couple of words more. I'd say delete all of them now. RockManQ (talk) 02:42, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of content. Ron B. Thomson (talk) 21:24, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep on the basis that other participating countries have an entry that is not contested here. We're not wasting paper with minimal stubs. Equendil Talk 21:32, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Macedonia-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  17:53, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Jerry   delusional ¤ kangaroo 01:42, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, totally useless. We don't have unsourced articles about things that could happen, it's that simple. Punkmorten (talk) 10:19, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.