Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republican Palace


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep --JAranda &#124; watz sup 01:23, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

Republican Palace
No words, just pictures. HN2 03:10, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Thats the IRAQ republican palace... and it does exist as a real place... move images into govt of iraq or saddam hussein somehow.  ALKIVAR &trade;Radioactivity symbol.png 03:19, 26 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep, Saddam Hussein's largest palace. Gazpacho 04:10, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. --Vsion 04:26, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, maybe we could get a speedy keep now there are actual words in the article. Kappa 04:32, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep now that there are words here, but do the pictures need to be that big? Sjakkalle (Check!)  09:36, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Conditional Keep - expand and check that the pictures have correct licensing listed. -- NSLE (Communicate!)  11:12, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. While I'm not one to consider anything with four walls notable, I'd have to say any and every palace is notable, particularly this one. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 11:52, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Saddam's palace is notable. But please downsize the images and be somewhat selective in which ones to add to the article. - Mgm|(talk) 11:57, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep but as mentioned above the images need to be cleared, resized, one should be dropped, and the article expanded. Right now there is more content in images than article.--Isotope23 14:39, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep with the same requests made by Isotope23. 23skidoo 15:13, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. I am constantly amazed. Seriously. I am. Trollderella 16:09, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * When nominated, it was a contextless, textless gallery of pictures, deletable as-is under WP:NOT (although I would have tagged it for context, myself). Personally, I'm amazed we didn't have an article about the Iraqi Republican Palace. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 02:00, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * If I hadn't nominated it for deletion, it would have never been improved. HN2 21:36, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep CalJW 01:35, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep This was mentioned all the time during the war. Carina22 18:59, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is definatley a noteable place, but take away a few imagaes and expand the article. The Republican 03:17, 28 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.