Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republican Party (United States) vice presidential candidates, 2000


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:37, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Republican Party (United States) vice presidential candidates, 2000

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Completely unsourced and made entirely of speculation as to who may have been considered. Notable in a loose sense, but a cleaned up version would contain no information not available in other related articles. — Hysteria18 • Talk • Contributions 19:07, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete there is no source, and seems to be WP:OR Empire3131 (talk) 04:06, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom: speculation, perhaps a past tense of WP:Crystal Ball?  bahamut0013  words deeds   16:57, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect to United_States_presidential_election,_2000. No crystal ball/verifiability/OR concerns here, because there are plenty of reliable sources in the media discussing the selection process in 2000.  Right now, the subject is covered adequately in the main article on the US 2000 presidential election, so no stand-alone article is necessary; however, if the relevant section in that article is expanded, it could merit a spin-off article.  Baileypalblue (talk) 18:53, 14 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Any of the names I put on their were from a source available on the page.Rockyobody (talk) 21:28, 14 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment In that case, it shouldn't be that difficult for you to cut and paste those sources over to your article. On a serious article about a subject of historical interest, citations are indispensible.  Mandsford (talk) 22:51, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Information available at United_States_presidential_election,_2000. Unlikely search term. -Atmoz (talk) 23:45, 14 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.