Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republican Party of Labour and Justice


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kpg  jhp  jm  04:55, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Republican Party of Labour and Justice

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

1) the article does not show the significance and importance of the party. 2) the article does not refer to external, authoritative, independent media. 3) the article has an advertising, news, non-analytical, non-detailed character. The article contains original research. The article deceives the reader and misleads the reader. by rules, the article needs to be deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.72.210.210 (talk) 09:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: Cleanup this AfD Hhkohh (talk) 15:11, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belarus-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:35, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:35, 16 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep party has won seats at both national and local level. It should be improved but it is clearly a notable topic.--TM 15:52, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Nom has discussed some problems with the article but there is no dispute about the notability. Kraose (talk) 14:42, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Not really seeing most the problems the IP author of the nom has claimed to exist in the article. No question about the notability either - has 3/110 seats in the national parliament. The article should be improved though - most sentences are unsourced and most of the refs are not from independent outlets. Openlydialectic (talk) 16:10, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * P.S. Here's a google books search for the russian-language name of the party . As you can see by the number of books in the query, there's clearly enough scholarship on the topic which means there's both notability for the article and accessible means of improving the article. Openlydialectic (talk) 16:13, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep having multiple members in a national parliament clearly demonstrates "significance and importance", even in Belarus. The article needs improvement, not deletion. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 01:06, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Please read WP:BEFORE before you nominate another article. The article needs improvement but clearly passes NORG having won election at multiple levels of government, you can't say there's never coverage about this and that satisfies WP:NEXIST. It also seems your attempt to delete it at ru-wiki is not successful.. –Ammarpad (talk) 10:58, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep A political party with representation on multiple levels of government is self-evidently notable. AusLondonder (talk) 09:49, 20 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.