Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republicans Block Investigation of Domestic Spying Program


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was deleted per PROD, with no objections on AFD. — Phil Welch 20:43, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Republicans Block Investigation of Domestic Spying Program
Democratic press release. POV. Don't see an applicable speedy category. Can we get rid of this faster than prod? Thatcher131 05:55, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * (Speedy) delete as blatantly non-encyclopedic.  dbtfz talk 06:58, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unencyclopedic. Press release = POV. Grandmasterka 08:11, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as clear breach of NPOV. Certainly it is appropriate for John Conyers' website but not ours. What is the protocol when something is both on AfD and proposed deletion or PD? Capitalistroadster 09:49, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete POV/soapbox -- Ruby  14:20, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as POV article. --Ter e nce Ong 15:04, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as POV essay.--Isotope23 15:59, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a soapbox.--Jersey Devil 16:33, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy this and get the NPOV soapbox folks outta here.--み使い Mitsukai 20:31, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Wikipedia is not a political bulletin board. Daniel Case 03:40, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete POV/soapbox Sandy 15:54, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a news source. --TML1988 00:44, 21 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.