Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republicrat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Nominator indef blocked, no other delete votes NW ( Talk ) 18:50, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Republicrat

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Every source is from Google. As a matter of fact, it depends on the number of times a term shows up in Google Search.  ☭ Fr yP od  15:02, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - I looked through the "References" such as they are that are currently in the article and could not find any significant coverage in reliable sources. Then I checked the news search and there is a large volume of hits.  From many different news agencies going back to 1954.  The term appears to be widely used by reliable sources.  The article definitely needs work, but it appears to be a notable term.   GB fan  talk 16:23, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.