Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reputation Poll International


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Reputation Poll International

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

An article about a reputation management company.I am bringing this to AfD as some might regard the large number of references as making PROD unsafe, but these refs are PR coverage of names included in their various polls, which would fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. Searches are not finding evidence that this firm has attained notability in its own right. AllyD (talk) 11:32, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 11:32, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:20, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:26, 8 November 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 16:47, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep I saw you first reviewed the page, i dont know why you then tagged for deletation. However, i think Reputation Poll has decent coverage if you can search it and it has been featured on key platforms.Nenerue (talk) 10:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
 * The article was marked as reviewed by Twinkle when this AfD discussion was opened. It would be helpful for this discussion if you can point to substantial coverage about the company? AllyD (talk) 12:02, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: A PR organization doing PR stuff, . Nothing we can use for GNG. We need things ABOUT the company, not lists BY the company. Oaktree b (talk) 19:58, 15 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.