Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Requests for comment/Alleged admin culture of abuse and tolerance of abuse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was relisted at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Alleged admin culture of abuse and tolerance of abuse (not by me) --Doc ask? 17:01, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

Requests for comment/Alleged admin culture of abuse and tolerance of abuse
Obviously, a highly unusual AfD, but I think in this case an AfD is proper. This RfC was deleted because of improper use of RfC process and, as is in my opinion more fatal, failue to have a second certification within the requisite 48 hours. I don't think it can/should be revived by a second certification showing up subsequently (quite a bit past the deadline); rather, it should be deleted. If Silverback wants to redo it, it should be redone from step 1 properly this time. Delete. --Nlu 15:50, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree with the sentiment above, but this should really be at WP:MD or preferably sorted out at Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Alleged admin culture of abuse and tolerance of abuse. a ndroid 79  15:54, 7 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.