Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Requests for comment/Keetoowah

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy keep. Barring exceptional circumstances, we don't delete certified RfCs, and exceptional circumstances don't get run through VfD. --Carnildo 05:54, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Requests for comment/Keetoowah
This page is nothing more than a libelous personal attack on another Wikipedian by an anon user. The page attacks Keetoowah's racial identity and the anon user is making his comments based upon no evidence or personal experience with Keetoowah. The page fulfills no purpose other than to attack Keetoowah personally. It is libelous. Keetoowah 15:04, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Fixed link title. Keep--we don't delete RFCs. Please be aware of No legal threats. Meelar (talk) 15:17, August 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep -- we don't VfD RFCs. If they don't get certified, they go away; if they get certified, they go through the process.  Antandrus  (talk) 15:25, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and Reopen -- This is demostrating the exact type of behavior that led to the Rfc in the first place. -- This vote by User:Gorgonzilla Please sign your votes.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.