Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Requiem for MH-17 (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  08:26, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Requiem for MH-17
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I suggest deleting this article per WP:N and WP:INHERIT, since the notability of the tragedy does not automatically make the poem notable. The article is mostly retelling the content of the poem (in violation of WP:PLOT), and the second- and third-party coverage is marginal at best. It was already proposed for deletion for exactly the same reasons about a year ago (the result was "no consensus"), and nothing seems to have changed since then (there was no new media coverage). Buzz105 (talk) 19:02, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Barely worth a mention in the reactions section of the main article, let alone having its own page. Fails WP:N and WP:INHERIT.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 19:23, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: I agree, not notable. Might bear a very brief mention in Malaysia Airlines Flight 17‎. - Ahunt (talk) 12:42, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.