Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Requiem for a Dream (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. If anyone wants to create a redirect then they can do so. Davewild (talk) 07:54, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Requiem for a Dream (album)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No non-trivial sources. Unreleased album, fails WP:NALBUMS. Another editor tried to AFD this but only put a broken AFD link on the log. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 02:22, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as a hoax. The unreleased albums policy does not apply, though, as can be seen with basic investigation. Some amateur recently mashed up the two albums and the junk can be downloaded from a few shifty websites. The text of this article is a completely invented history. Take a look at the one source given in the article. -- D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 18:49, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - not terribly likely. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:25, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete this ridiculous hoax of an article, and grab your sweaters, while you're at it. BTW, someone apparently has been using the article page as a talk page, so I cleaned it up a bit.  Erpert  Who is this guy? 07:50, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect as a search term to Requiem for a Dream (soundtrack). -- RoninBK T C 23:00, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - This last vote is a pretty good idea, but such an action should be completed after the hoax-y content of this article is eliminated. -- D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 17:32, 7 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Absolutely no sources, appears to be hoax.  ~ [ Scott M. Howard  ] ~ [  Talk  ]:[  Contribs  ] ~  19:01, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.