Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rerum Novarum Centre (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  12:47, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Rerum Novarum Centre
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Looks to fail WP:GNG but it also operates in languages that I do not master. Largely based on related sources and plain listings. The Banner talk 07:33, 28 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment Andreas Philopater requested an undelete of this article and Graeme Bartlett accepted it. See Requests_for_undeletion. PorkchopGMX 16:33, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
 * True, softdeleted and requested back as No participation in deletion discussion; would at least like to take a look at what was deleted. As far as I know a softdelete and undeletion with a non-content argument allows me to re-nominate. The Banner talk 17:38, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, didn’t know. PorkchopGMX 12:35, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:17, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:17, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:17, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. The China Daily, The National Catholic Reporter and National Taiwan University are all significant sources independent of the article subject. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 03:48, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:04, 5 October 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep as per the reliable sources coverage identified above by Andreas Philopater, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 17:30, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:52, 12 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.