Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rescreatu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Secret account 02:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Rescreatu

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The nominator of this article,, says "non-notable website, unencyclopedic". Procedural nomination. No opinion is being expressed by me. ➔ REDVEЯS is standing in the dark 12:42, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete. It certainly has an internet presence, but it fails WP:WEB because I can find no reliable source that mentions it at all. Most mentions are either the site itself, or sites that permit the user to control the content. The site does claim close to 40,000 members, which does tend to suggest notability, but again, I can't find a disinterested source to back this up. Xymmax (talk) 14:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.   -- --  pb30 < talk > 04:05, 17 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ➔ REDVEЯS is standing in the dark 11:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not presently shown to be notable. Until subject is demonstrably significant, an article would all too readily be used to promote the subject. —SlamDiego&#8592;T 13:27, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.