Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ResearchID


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. - Bobet 21:15, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

ResearchID
I originally slapped a PROD on this one a few months ago, which was removed. Since then, I see no evidence that this site meets WP:WEB, so I figured it was time to bring it to discussion. The Wiki's Recent changes show that a majority of articles on it are edited/created by three or four people, the main page has only got about 9,000 hits total since it's inception per the counter at the bottom. Also, while not a perfect indicator, there are a lot of hits for it, but very few from sites that are not blogs, other Wikis, forums, etc. Delete unless someone can provide more evidence to this site's importance per WP:WEB. -- Kinu t /c  16:50, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WEB. Article doesn't assert notability, and I didn't find anything to show that this meets WP:WEB. Alexa rank is 1,160,026, and incoming links on Google show only a handful of sites linking to it . William Pietri 17:22, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Thanks for pointing out that researchintelligentdesign.org is the same site... I was having trouble finding an Alexa rank for the alias, but your information looks like another nail in the coffin. -- Kinu t /c  17:39, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WEB. Does not meet any of the three criteria listed for sufficient notability.  --Satori Son 14:43, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable today, try again later. Sorry -- MrDolomite | Talk 17:54, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.