Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Research Peptides


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. clearly an advertisement; G11 would have been reasonable  DGG ( talk ) 04:11, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Research Peptides

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company. All 5 sources are press releases, and Google search did not reveal any other in-depth coverage. SPA-editing with unclear COI status. GermanJoe (talk) 14:57, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 14:59, 29 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Subject lacks significant notability and independent coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 15:41, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:12, 29 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete and I frankly consider this speedy material: Advertorial with its own press releases and trivial passing mentions along with no chances of notability is by far enough to delete. SwisterTwister   talk  22:29, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:43, 31 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.